|

|
Dots
& Slashes
|
What
ARE "Dots" and "Slashes"...?
In the TV world
there's "cheers and jeers." In the movie world there's
"thumbs up" and "thumbs down." Well, here in
cyberspace, there are (...) dots and (/) slashes. Such are
the icons for this web site's own quickie "thumbs up" and
"thumbs down" list, which is added to whenever the latest
entertainment news requires it. What news
bytes hit their mark, and which should be slashed? Here are the latest of
them.
Past Lists:
-
Fall,
2004
-
Summer, 2004
-
Spring 2004
-
Winter/ 1st
Quarter, 2004
-
4th Q, 2003
-
Summer 2003
-
Spring 2003
-
Winter/1stQ,
2003
-
Fall/Early
Winter, 2002
-
Summer, 2002
-
Spring, 2002
-
Winter/1st
quarter, 2002
-
Fall/Winter
2001
-
September
11, 2001
-
Summer 2001
-
Spring 2001
-
Winter 2000
-
Fall 2000
-
Spring/Summer
2000
-
Winter/1st
Quarter 2000
-
Premiere
Dot/Slash List, 1999
-
For the most current list, click here.
-----------------
Feel free to contribute.
As always, review
submissions are accepted!
------------------
|
|
|
Winter/Early 2005
Want Something
Praised...or "Slashed"? Send a note, and
we'll add it to the list!
DOT
: ...to coming back with a bang. The Amazing Race 7
may not have the cutest teams, but it certainly has the most intriguing
lineup in over two seasons. Not one team in the game --even upon the
premiere-- leaves you with a boring "who were they again?"
feeling. From a gay son and his mom to Survivor's Rob and Amber, and even
a former military POW and his pageant winning girlfriend; there is barely
any possibility this won't be the best season ever. Does this mean the
series has finally earned its place in prime time, and not the
summer-repeat abyss where it was for over two full seasons? One can only
hope so.
Slash : ...to the inane "one month of
repeats" scheduling falderal of ABC's hit series, Lost. Okay,
fine; there are only three sweeps months per season. That's no excuse to
suddenly go on entire one month "vacations" from new episodes,
only to return one month later and offer an episode that --let's be
candid-- simply wasn't worth the wait. In fact, when the series went into
repeat-month status back in December, the returning episode acted like the
big cliffhanger --Claire's abduction-- barely even happened at all. Now we
know that the hatch Locke wants to open is cursed --or, something to that
effect...maybe-- and who wants to take bets on how this too will be
overlooked upon mid April, over a month after the last new episode aired?
Enough.
DOT
: ...to using well known video game characters for
multiple projects. This February marked the release of a new third person
action adventure from Namco for the Playstation 2, Death by Degrees. What
makes the title so interesting is that it stars the character "Nina
Williams," who is often one of the fighters in the Tekken game
series. This is a brilliant plan; to reuse intriguing video game
characters for multiple projects. Hey; why not guest spots? I'm serious!
Give Kate Archer a cameo
in a James Bond game. Put Lara Croft in a game with Indiana Jones. In the
film world, people are given cameos all the time; same thing happens in
television. So why can't a video game character in one video game make a
guest appearance in another? It sounds fabulous!

Slash : ...to Playboy magazine, for
vainly snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
It's immaterial if you care or not that a staple in 1980's teenage pop music
history, Debbie Gibson,
finally decided to pose for a sexy pictorial in the March Playboy. The
point is she deserved the cover when doing so, and Playboy
knows this...but didn't give it to her. Some doofus decided to give it to Paris
Hilton instead, who's barely even mentioned in the magazine at all. Oh
yeah; a shot of someone who is barely even in the actual magazine is going to sell more magazines than the
one who's actually in the magazine. Come on. For shame Playboy.
Slash : ...to the stupefying video editing of the
recent season of The Amazing Race 6, and how it made winners Freddy
and Kendra almost impossible to root for, despite the fact they inevitably
won. Seriously; did we need to hear Kendra's comment of how the poverty
stricken people in a third world country "keep on breeding"...?
No. Yet show that clip they did --twice!-- making the finale far more
disappointing along the way. If they hadn't shown Kendra's many
spoiled-rich-girl, snooty little euphemisms, maybe we could've rooted for
them far more, making the finale far less unpalatable. So why'd they show
them?
DOT
: ...to Brad Pitt,
who left the banter of the Western tabloid journalist behind,
while promoting the premiere of Oceans Twelve in Japan. Sure, it
seems a bit rude to have only Asian reporters allowed inside the press
event (and even then, only reporters who would sign a waiver to not bring
up Brad Pitt's separation from Jennifer Anniston). Then
again; it's a press junket for the film, not Brad, so for Brad
to suspect that Western journalists would
suddenly make the event become the "Brad and Jennifer" news hour...? That
sounds like a reasonable assumption to us. Kudos must go to Brad, then,
for keeping a press event for the movie limited only to journalists
interested in the movie, and not making a press junket all "Me, me,
me." After all; if they weren't interested in the movie, why did they
think they could go there asking about something almost entirely
different?
----------------------------------
Agree? Disagree? Send
comments to Techtite Letters.
| All Text, Title
graphics, and the DOT/Slash icons are created by Techtite, copyright
1999-2004; all rights reserved. Pictures of products, if any, are used only for purpose of
review, with copyrights still held by their respective owners. For further "legalese" &
disclaimers, click here... |
|