|

|
|
"Steven Spielberg attempted
such a story, via the live-action Hook...and failed
miserably. This film does, by comparison, have more than its fair
share of charm. It's just that with a little spit and polish, it could
have been so much more."
---from the review
-----------------
Feel free to contribute.
As always, review submissions are
accepted!
------------------
-------------
Sidebar
::
-------------
Once again, I ask;
how long can this "sequel" sales pitch last? Sure,
fairy tale stories are in large supply, yet still quite limited. Sure,
Disney is beginning to feel the fairy tale well run a little dry, with all
the best tales told already, in years past, mostly by Walt Disney himself.
However, they are missing the boat in a very big way, when wasting the
prospect of alleged "sequels" on their direct-to-video animation
troupe. The original films were classics; their sequels deserve no less
respect. While I would never say that this film is as poorly animated as Disney's
Atlantis last year, it isn't very much better, either. To be blunt,
Peter Pan, after years of Broadway musicals, TV parodies, and the classic
Disney film, deserves much better.
|
|
|
Peter Pan :
Return to Neverland

Click
picture to order this DVD.
 VHS
casette also available. Click this link for Return to Never Land (VHS)
The Film:
This was a theatrically-released film that wanted us to believe that Disney went all-out to make a
theater-quality Peter Pan sequel. Well, why not? After all, as the classic
opening words of the original film stated, "This all happened before,
and it will all happen again..." It was implied that Peter Pan had
visited Wendy's house many times, for many generations. Now, he's
returned, to help her overly-realistic daughter to imagine, to dream, and
to believe. If that was the idea proposed on the storyboards, it was a
cute one. Where Peter Pan in
'Return to Neverland' fails is, its animation is irrefutably by
their Television, Saturday-Morning-Cartoon department, and not their
superior, feature-film department. The last time I saw the latter was in Disney's Tarzan,
with Glen Keane once again in charge of drawing the title character (his
prior work has helped bring to life The Little Mermaid,
Beauty's Beast, and many other modern classics). Word is he's currently busy
with Disney's next big thing, Treasure Planet; a sci-fi
modernization of the classic Treasure Island story. That
sounds like fun; the same childish fun that could've --and should've-- been present
here. Not
that there isn't some fun here, for the littler kids. If your kids loved Lady
& the Tramp 2 and Cinderella
2 on video, they should like this as well. In
a sense, this is the type of "never lose your ability to dream"
story that always makes you feel good inside, in every incantation it's
offered in. It should also be noted
that, regardless of its flaws, this might be the best Peter Pan "next
generation" story ever attempted. Steven Spielberg attempted such a story, via the live-action Hook...and failed
miserably. This film does, by comparison, have more than its fair
share of charm. It's just that with a little spit and polish, it could
have been so much more. While
the overall story here is a bit obvious, I'll summarize it anyway. Wendy
has a daughter, Jane, who doesn't believe in fairy tales...or
fairies...or, in particular, Peter Pan. Why should she...? A generation
after the first film took place, this is a girl forced to grow up quickly,
during World War 2...which Jane's soldier father may or may not
return from. This is a lot of reality for such a young girl, and as a
result, she's forgotten how to dream. She's given a rude wake-up call,
when Hook kidnaps her, thinking she's Wendy. The rest of the story --Jane
is saved by Peter Pan, she meets Tinkerbell, she must "think happy
thoughts" to fly, etc.-- pretty much writes itself, yet still
maintains its fair share of charm. Animation
quality aside, I had a bigger gripe with this film; its salute to
modernized Peter Pan concepts like Hook, more than the classic Disney film. For one thing, nothing can happen in
Neverland unless you believe it can. This led to one of the stupider scenes in Hook,
where the Lost Boys must "imagine" food in order to eat it (yes,
I'm serious). In a similar scenario here, Tinker Bell can't do her stuff
until Jane believes in fairies. Shouldn't there be a democratic process
here...? I mean, every other living soul in Neverland --not to mention
millions of her fans through the years!-- would be more than ready to believe in Tinker
Bell! After all, if Jane was already kidnapped via a flying pirate ship, why is she still so quizzical? This film could have
been a box office smash, if given the respect of most other Disney
projects. I'm reminded of Pixar's original Toy Story
deal with Disney, which was initially intended as a mere direct-to-video
project, only to have Pixar scrap all their original work and reshoot
every scene with quality worthy of a theatrical offering. Was the same
respect given here, when an apparent TV-animation troupe was given the
go-ahead to make a theatrical film? I wonder. In the end, one thing is
certain; as admirable as the film is,
Peter-Pan deserved better.
The DVD:
First of all, if you're going to have a "storybook" as a bonus
feature on a Peter Pan DVD, why make the story involve...Cubby? For those
who don't know, Cubby is the chubby lost boy. However, why didn't the
storybook on-screen (shown in slide-show format for kids, either narrated
or read-along) pertain to a story about Peter Pan...or Tinkerbell...or
Wendy's daughter, Jane? This is one disappointment among a few on this
disc, since once again a child-oriented bonus selection means no audio
commentary track. A "rescue the
lost boys" adventure game (playable right on your DVD player) is more
on target. It's quick yet fun for kids, like most of the interactive games
on Disney DVD these days (although my favorite is still the Seven Dwarves
mine quest, in the Snow White
Platinum Edition). This isn't half as cool, however, as the
DVD-ROM demo of You Can Fly!, which is one of Disney Interactive's
better game offerings for PC users (you'll need a PC with a DVD drive to
install the demo, though). Older kids
& parents will more enjoy the music video featurette of "I'll
Try" with Jonatha Brooke, which was the best new song to be offered
in the film. There are also deleted scenes (for an animated feature!),
which although there are only two of them are intriguing looks at early
animation techniques prior to the final shots seen in theaters. One scene
is an extension of the scene where Jane first meets Captain Hook, where
she gives him the same "I don't believe in you" lip she later
gives Peter Pan and Tinker Bell, with a less favorable reaction from
Hook. The second clip involves
Tinker Bell, and an abandoned concept where the reason she feels so awful
near the middle of the film is because Hook gave her a poisoned cake. They
later chose to have her at risk of "losing her light" because
Jane doesn't believe in fairies. The scene is suffixed by Sharon Morrill
(Executive in Charge of Production) saying this choice ultimately made the
story more strong. I don't know; I still think that the idea of one little
skeptical girl (among so many Tinker Bell fans) causing Tinker Bell to
nearly "die" was not a strong part of the film. The
bottom line is, that even the most marginally-thumbs-up of Disney fare is
far better than most of what is offered to children elsewhere. As much as
half of Cartoon Network's offerings are garbage. As for Nick Toons; don't
get me started! Disney could've had a classic with just a little bit more
faith, trust, and pixie dust. Without it, it's still a good video
rental...and perhaps even to own. It just could've been so much more.
Click
picture to order this DVD.
 VHS
casette also available. Click this link for Return to Never Land (VHS)
| All text, Title
graphics, and pix not of reviewed products, are created by Techtite,
copyright 1999-2001; all rights reserved. Picture of DVD cover is used only for the purpose of review (and to make shopping for
product easier); it by no means represents any affiliation with Techtite
and the distributors of this product. For further "legalese"
& disclaimers, click here... |
|