|

|
|
"...the finale
really shocked me ---as it did everyone, from what I hear. Oddly enough,
it's not that Trista didn't choose the perfect guy for a fiancée; it's
just that nobody ever thought that anyone on this show would be that
smart!"
---from the review
------------------
Sidebar
::
-------------
Can one girl be in love
with two boys? Right up to the
finale, Trista would say yes. This is debatable. Let's be frank;
one person can be hormonally attracted to more than
one person; that's
an understatement, that applies to men as well as women.
However, "love"...? While I may get letters
refuting this, I don't see how one woman could "love" two guys
with equal intensity, unless she was in love with one emotionally, in love
with the other hormonally, and wanted to sell it off as being
"in love" with both, equally. How does this apply to Trista,
Charlie, and Ryan? Well, let's just say that she chose the one she was
emotionally attracted to. Though if she was to tell me she still had
feelings for Charlie, I'd say; take a cold shower, then we'll talk. It's one
thing for your fiancée to admit having feelings for Brad Pitt; it's another
thing entirely to call such feelings "love."
-----------------
Feel free to contribute.
As always, review submissions are
accepted!
-----------------
|
|
|
The Bachelorette

(review posted February 6th,
2003)
(review updated
post-finale: February 20th,
2003)
Okay, I admit it: I was
no big fan of The Bachelor
last year. No sooner do they cast a total goofball as the first
"bachelor," then they cast a second bachelor with all the
charisma of a stewed carrot. Now, they try to redeem themselves with a
reverse gender version of the series, now called The
Bachelorette. Is the show any better?
Well, let's put it this way: Trista is far easier to look at for nine
nights. On the other hand, the show is exactly the same. All this
proves is: no matter who's in the title role, this is still a pretty tepid
way to find a lifelong partner.
Here's
the deal; one year ago, The Bachelor offered its first season finale, with Bachelor Number 1, Alex, choosing buxom party girl
Amanda over Trista. Men wrote in
to complain; so many, the idea for The Bachelorette was
formed, with Trista in the title role. "Tit for tat"...? Yes,
that about sums it up.
However,
this "tit for tat" show is hardly just trying to be vindictive;
there's every possibility Trista could find a suitable groom, here. Said victims --er,
contestants-- include a bevy of
bachelors who would like to court her, which include: a poetic fireman, a
playboy with a Tiffany's
box under his hand, and an always-laughing "nice guy" who to me
looked just like an adult Jerry Mathers from Leave it to Beaver.
Much like Alex and Aaron, Trista dates the guys, chooses who
she'll keep dating, and dumps the rest. In the end, she chooses the guy
who'll propose.
Admittedly, this is a much different
show with the genders reversed. This is due in no small part to the men,
who have shown far more candor and common courtesy than most ladies
of prior "seasons." There was always some catty female trying to get
said bachelor aside so she could tell him stuff like "this candidate
doesn't like you like I do pick me
you jerk me me me!" I have yet to see a single
man be as back-stabbing on The Bachelorette, and when seeing so
many men
in business suits calmly waiting to be invited to court said bachelorette, it
does give one hope that "gentleman" is not a swear word
anymore.
Not
that even the nicest of people could keep this show from being the trash TV
that it is. Sadly, this includes Trista; an ex-cheerleader, and a college
graduate as well, yet not Miss Perfect, either. Many conversations end with Trista
resorting to her Minnie-Mouse voice, often when trying to get
her point across in a "cuter" way. Perhaps she uses this voice
because, as soon as the Minnie Mouse voice disappears, her chances to put
her foot in her mouth increase. When booting off the Jerry
Mathers look-alike, she comforts him by claiming if she could choose a
fifth-last finalist, he'd be #5, without considering how
condescending such a "compliment" is. I doubt this guy will go home and cheer, "I'm # 5! I'm # 5!" Come on.
Trista's Achilles' heel
is quite obvious by the finale: she has not yet gotten over the shattered
ego she faced thanks to the first Bachelor show. Consider the
second-last episode, when booted contestants are given the chance to
"set the record straight" about the good and bad of being on the
show at all. As with prior seasons, this interview session is concluded
with the title "star" coming on stage, answering questions
personally. Yet in both prior seasons, both of the male bachelors had the
confidence to reply to all accusations of "misdeeds" with
courtesy and good manners, and not be reduced to saying what can only be
summarized as:
"AM NOT! AM NOT!" Sadly, Trista does
not have such confidence. In the end, a vain attempt to show "who's
in charge" only showed how vulnerable she truly is.
However, all that being
said, the finale really shocked me ---as it did everyone, from what I
hear. Oddly enough, it's not that Trista didn't choose the perfect guy for
a fiancée; it's just that nobody ever thought that anyone on this show
would be that smart! Tabloids up to this episode insisted she chose Charlie; a
guy whose best trait is that he looks good in a muscle
shirt, and...no, that's about it. People were insistent that the hunkier
guy won over the more romantic, fun-loving guy, as did I, when ready to
write a scathing final paragraph to this review. I had thought it impossible that a woman of 2003 would make a
fair, impartial choice of who to marry, and not just who would look cute
holding her hand at cocktail parties. Trista proved me wrong, and I stand
dutifully corrected. It seems that love does conquer all, on at least one
occasion. In the process, this season of "The Bachelor" gets a
very solid thumbs up. However, can the magic last? I doubt it. Take my
advice, ABC, and quit while you're ahead.
---Techtite
Opinions? Speak your mind in
Techtite's Letters Page!
| All text, Title
graphics, and pix not of reviewed products, are created by Techtite,
copyright 1999-2001; all rights reserved. Screen captures of program
reviewed are used only for the purpose of review, and by no means represents any affiliation with Techtite
and the distributors of this entertainment product. For further "legalese"
& disclaimers, click here... |
|