|
|
I'm a Celebrity:
Get Me Out of Here!

(review posted February
21st,
2003)
CBS has been teasing us
for years about a possible "celebrity Survivor." It was
inevitable someone would attempt to beat them to the punch, and in the process, make total
imbeciles of themselves.
I'm a Celebrity: Get Me Out of Here! had the celebrities though
not the charm, ingenuity, or quite frankly, fairness of Survivor.
Yeah, I know what you're thinking; how could Survivor --a show with
alliances, back-stabs, petty cat fights, and double-crossing-- possibly
have a show that is "less fair" when compared to it? See one
episode of I'm a Celebrity, and you'll have your answer.
Here's the deal: 10
celebrities are dropped into the Australian jungle, with merely cots and an outhouse. For food,
they have an allegedly clean water spring, beans,
and rice. They will be here for two weeks, on a nightly mini-series, to be
shown "live" (i.e.: only 90% pre-taped). Yeah, I know what
you're thinking; with so many "luxuries" never seen on Survivor
(cots? beans? "a toilet"?), this sounds like a cakewalk. Yeah; that
is probably what
the celebrities' agents
told them, too.
You
may ask what celebrities would agree to
being part of this. They include: Melissa Rivers
(Joan's daughter), Downtown Julie Brown (an ex MTV "VJ"), Chris Judd (Jennifer Lopez' ex), Robin Leach
(1980's host of TV's Lifestyles of the Rich
& Famous), Bruce Jenner (1970's Olympian), Alana Stewart (Rod's
ex), "Stuttering John" Melendez (a recurring guest on radio's
Howard Stern show), Maria Conchita Alonzo (best known for her role in
Arnold Schwarzenegger's
underdog hit, The Running Man),
Tyson Beckford (male model; aka, the beefcake), and Nikki
Schieler Zierling (a Playboy Plamate; aka, the cheesecake). No matter what
your feeling is of the motley crew chosen here, one thing must be agreed
upon; they deserved better than
this. So do viewers.
So, what do these celebrities do for "suspense"
on this show? Good question. Every night, viewers vote for one of the
stars to endure a "bushtucker trial," which is sort of like a Survivor
reward challenge, without the reward. It doesn't help that the
choice of who-goes-to-what challenge is left up to the home viewers, who
on the majority, are even bigger imbeciles than the people behind this TV show.
To wit: they consistently choose the celebrity least suited
for the challenge. To make matters worse: if the celebrity fails, then nobody
gets any additional food, for that whole day! What does the hapless
celebrity get, for success at these trials? Carrots, potatoes, corn,
and...quite frankly, crap. In between humiliations like these, they get to sing a little rap song
about each celebrity in the series. YAWN.
Not that all challenges
are that impossible. Some are simple "Fear Factor"
stunts...yet these are being done by celebrities, mind you, who are not
too keen on being within a hundred yards of a bug, let alone a whole tank
of them.
Even Melissa Rivers could not hold back an outburst on the very first day of the
show, where she cried of the "humiliation" she was asked to
face, to put bugs in a pair of see-through clown-sized plastic pants
to get her "team" food for the day. While it's easy to feel sorry for
her, I ask you: isn't this the same woman who helps bad-mouth Oscar nominees every
year, on the E! channel's Oscar night post-show? Her entire career is based on
dissing people on what is meant to be the happiest night of their lives:
"Her shoes don't match her purse!...She's too old to wear
that!"...and to see her complain about a bug seems like a trifle.
What's worse; whether she does the challenge or not (which she did), it
isn't interesting to watch.
However,
other challenges are not just humiliating; they're downright
dangerous, and for this program, totally stupid. It doesn't help that
their choice of host, John Lehr, lacks the experience to narrate such
dangerous stunts as these. He does well with the goofier stunts --bugs,
and what-not-- though when poor Nikki was being sent into a swamp of
crocodiles --with her only protection being one guy with a tranquilizer gun
(no, I'm serious)-- John Lehr was clearly a fish out of water. It was
quite apprehensive to see a teary-eyed Nikki ask John how deep
the water was in the crocodile swamp, to which he unknowingly shrugged, "Uh, I dunno!"
Question: if it isn't his job to know, what is the point of a
"host"...? He got better --slightly-- as the "live"
show proceeded, though keep in mind; this is not a situation where one can
simply "wing it as you go along." While John could learn to
become a satisfactory host after a year of practice, this was just a
two-week series.
Sadly, the series'
boredom would only go from worse to worst. By the end of week one, the B
(and in some cases, C) grade celebrities threatened a walkout, and in the
process, got everything their little spoiled backsides desired: roofs over
their cots, a raw chicken for every celebrity, and a pack of cigs for
every smoker. A mere halfway through the series, this is as
believable a tale of "surviving" as Gilligan's Island.
While I don't want to see Nikki eaten by crocodiles, I do not
want to see Julie Brown smoking a cigarette next to an almost perennially
benched Robin Leach, eating
fresh chicken, as they pat each others' backs for bravely "roughing
it." In the end, it was a tougher two weeks for the TV audience than
the "celebrities" on this "reality" show.
Yes, it can be said that
the most likeable celebrity won the popular vote --Chris Judd-- and
therein is reason for praise...though only for Judd, not the series.
While his win was a nice finale, it's not enough to keep the show itself
from the bottom of the barrel rating it deserves. It is of course nice
that his charity won half a million dollars for his hard work, though as
far as entertainment is concerned, the show fails.
As a parting thought: when faced
with TV this bad, how would this series be reviewed by a film critic,
who often only experiences two hours of bad entertainment, not two
weeks? I'm reminded of how many times
Roger Ebert used the word "hate" to describe how much he
"hated hated hated hated hated" the Rob Reiner film, North.
One wonders what he would say, about a bad, bad, bad, bad, bad
TV series such as this. If he reviewed such a series, would Ebert be
typing "bad" for a day? ...a week? ...a year? At the very least,
he'd send Reiner an apology, confessing that he finally saw something far
worse than North. That's pretty bad.
---Techtite
Opinions? Speak your mind in
Techtite's Letters Page!
| All text, Title
graphics, and pix not of reviewed products, are created by Techtite,
copyright 1999-2001; all rights reserved. Screen captures of program
reviewed are used only for the purpose of review, and by no means represents any affiliation with Techtite
and the distributors of this entertainment product. For further "legalese"
& disclaimers, click here... |
|