|
|
life as we know it

The now dated formula of
"lead actor talking to the camera" is a very volatile trick.
Treat the concept too gently, and viewers feel condescended; why tell
us what was already painfully obvious? Treat the concept too strongly, and the
story becomes boring; a narrative of what should've been acted, not
told. However, the real problem with this formula in life as
we know it, is that the people talking to the camera clearly have
no clue what they're talking about.
The
series' lead character is Dino. Jokes about Fred Flintstone's dog
notwithstanding, I think this kid first started losing my interest in him
when he tries to get his mom's attention by snapping her bra.
I'd just as soon believe a daughter would give her dad a wedgie. Even
though his mom is a tart --she's cheating on dad with her own son's gym
coach!-- that's no excuse for snapping mom's bra, kid. Maybe this
unrealistic scene was kept in the story because without it, this
entire premiere would've been an overly gratuitous rehash of Dawson's Creek's first
episode, practically scene-for-scene: the
sleazy mom, the best friend sleeping with his hot teacher, the girlfriend
of the lead character who's a bit of a tomboy.
Then again, if this show is going to imply that it's
normal for a teenage son to snap his mother's bra, why not allow for the
normal response, and have mom kick him in the groin?
Then
there's Dino's friend, Ben. Ben is for all intent this teen drama's
"Pacey," or so the writers want us to think, having so blatantly
ripped off
Ben's story from Pacey's. To wit: Ben is getting hot and heavy with a
school teacher, and even though high schoolboy Ben is about 256 shades
of "jail bait," she's willing to have an affair with him as
well.
In fact; early reviews of the original series pilot claim that she
performed a sex act on Ben in the premiere, but the scene was
cut. Keep your "little movie critic" at bay, boys; cutting such
an inane, unrealistic scene was one of the few smart decisions of this
series. At least this
teacher isn't so dumb as to give a boy a "quickie"
behind the tent of a local carnival.
Then
there's Kelly Osborne; this series' magnum opus in publicity hype. Here's what I don't get:
she's been cast as a chubby wallflower. No I'm not kidding here. They actually cast the daughter of Ozzy
Osborne as a
chubby wallflower. Whether
you like The Osbornes or
not is immaterial. Would you look at Kelly Osborne --even as a fictional
character-- and see a "wallflower"? As for
"chubby"...don't get me started. Kelly, I mean this in the nicest
way possible, but you are
totally wrong for this role. Then again, look at the bright side: nobody
can call you a bad actress here. The written dialogue is too
crappy to tell.
This
is just a small taste of the unreality in this so-called
"life as we know it." Really...?
Gee; I sort of missed the part of real life where teenage girls discuss losing their virginity
to their high school boyfriends while shopping for skimpy lingerie. They
even giggle doing it. They're about to lose their reputation! Yippee!
The biggest mistake of
this series, however, is how hard it tries to be another Dawson's
Creek. This is a mistake on many levels, because for one thing, the
very concept of a series about snippy teens mature beyond their years is
already a dated cliché. In superior dramas like The
O.C. realistic kids face realistic problems like unwanted
pregnancy or parents remarrying or possibly losing your girlfriend to a
guy you know to be a total jerk ("Oliver", anyone...?). In this show, a boy snaps the bra strap
of his own mother. This isn't a "to-may-to, to-mah-to"
difference; this is a like-night-and-day difference! There's a lot of ways
someone could make a teen drama superior to The O.C.. This isn't one of them.
Okay, maybe I should
follow a good example. That's enough "smack" from my end. So
let's talk a (very) short while about this series' successes. For one; its
lead stars are good looking enough. Second: unlike the recent flawed
attempt at teen dramatics, The Days, there
is no reverse sexism here, where all men are dumb and all women are rocket
scientists in training. No; this is an equality drama, where everyone
is an equal level of "village idiot." Is that
enough to make me want to keep watching? Nope. However; it is enough to
keep me from rating this a lowly "burnout" rating. That's
something, right?
---Techtite
Opinions? Speak your mind in
Techtite's Letters Page!
| All text, Title
graphics, and pix not of reviewed products, are created by Techtite,
copyright 1999-2004; all rights reserved. Screen captures of program
reviewed are used only for the purpose of review, and by no means represents any affiliation with Techtite
and the distributors of this entertainment product. For further "legalese"
& disclaimers, click here... |
|