Techtite's TV Reviews!

 

 

"...This is a scene to go down in infamy as the worst Muppet movie joke of all time. What. Were. They. Thinking?!?"

---from the review

 

------------------

Sidebar ::

-------------

No sidebar comments for this review... Yet...

 

--------------
MAIN PAGE
--------------
Reviews :
PC Games
Macintosh 
DVDs (& VHS!)
Movies (now playing)
Television
Gadgets & Gear
Hardcopy (Books)
Shows & Parks
X-box (360)
Playstation 3
Nintendo Wii
Game Cube
Nintendo DS
The PSP Page
Video Games (classic)
 

 Departments :

Snapshot of the Week:

  

Questions? Comments? Send Them To

Techtite Letters.

 

The Techtite Ratings System :

  • Burnout
  • Near Miss
  • Small Crater
  • Large Crater
  • Deep Impact

In Association with Amazon.com

The Muppets' Wizard of Oz

A Review by Techtite

It is interesting how many times someone reads about a TV show concept, only to ask, "Why haven't they ever thought of this before?" Then you see the final product, which answers that question in spades...and very sadly. The Muppet Wizard of Oz sounded like a slam-dunk for ABC. Yet something went wrong. No; not terribly wrong. Just...simply...wrong.

Perhaps someone just got drunk with all the ease this concept seemingly had. Take a classic movie. Add Muppets. Make Fozzie the lion. Make Gonzo the Tin Man. Make Kermit the scarecrow. Make Miss Piggy a dual role as the good and bad witches. Add a young pop singer as Dorothy. What could go wrong? Well...it did. That's all I can say.

You get the first sign of something mistaken happening here, when the ratings logo appears; "PG." Huh?!? This is supposedly a remake of a classic musical. What's with the Parental Guidance warning? Well, see; some marketing honcho apparently thought that to appeal to the junior high age bracket they had to add a few sex jokes. We'll be getting to how low these sex jokes fall soon enough, but let's just put it this way: PG "Wizard of Oz." Who approved that wacky plan?

Soon after the shock of the rating logo passes, we meet Toto the dog...er, shrimp?...No..."prawn." What's a prawn? Well, it's an edible shrimp with a bug like head and...oh, whatever. It's a walking bug-looking thing, as the dog in the movie. In fairness: one other time I remember seeing this Muppet was Muppets in Space, where he admittedly stole the show. He doesn't manage to steal anything here however. He's just a running gag that never makes the cut; a fish-like Toto, instead of a dog. This is funny at first but with every successive scene it seems more peculiar.

A prawn as Toto is a bad decision, to be sure. Yet no sight will have diehard Muppet fans chanting "Worst. Decision. Ever," like the moment the Wizard morphs into a sexy video game style character(!), then into a giant chicken(!!), all while trying to seduce Gonzo(!!!). What in the name of parenthood was someone thinking here? Yeah it's an old Muppet Show joke that Gonzo loves chickens, but for whatever reason that joke never seemed so, well..."icky." This is a scene to go down in infamy as the worst Muppet movie joke of all time. What. Were. They. Thinking?!?

Sadly; this is just one oddball scene in a very "PG" Wizard of OZ. For whatever reason we must be constantly reminded that "Toto" feels that he's a sex magnet. This reaches fever pitch when right out of the blue, Toto turns the knobs on "Tin" Gonzo's chest, wondering what they do. Oh, they do nothing, muses Gonzo; those are his nipples. If this is someone's idea of family friendly humor, I'd hate to see their idea of an R rated film. I doubt even HBO would ever air it.

Not that I'm a purist against PG humor. It's just that, if you wish to tarnish a family friendly story with potty humor, at least have it be funny to adults, or maybe high school kids, or...anybody, really. I must admit a chuckle at the sight of "good witch" Miss Piggy goosing Kermit. However, by the majority, all sexual innuendo falls flat.

It's not that this film didn't have great source material from two fronts. Parents will remember both a far superior original film (The Wizard of Oz) as well as far superior original Muppet jokes (The Muppet Show). Yet these two great sources of family fun, in this case, seem to hinder more than compliment each other. Whose idea was it to turn the Wicked Witch of the West into a biker chick? Probably the same guy who turned the field of poppy's into an underground "rave" club, of sorts. These are supposed to be jokes, yet only seem like bad decisions.

It's not that the movie is without any good points. It's just that there is so little of it. However, let's give kudos wherever they're due. The duo in charge of the Wizard's FX magic are Dr. Honeydew and Beaker; a cute added touch. Another cute idea was to make the munchkins 100 percent "P.C.," by making it a land of rats, with Rizzo their mayor. Upgrading Dorothy's friendly "Tin Woodsman" into an internet-friendly robot was a cute modern touch, even if it never goes anywhere. There's also an amusing cameo by Quentin Tarantino where he tries to sell the idea to "film producer" Kermit about a final battle with samurai swords, only to have Kermit decide, nah, let's just have Dorothy comically toss the witch across the room instead. There's also any number of cute cameos of classic Muppet icons, from The Frog Prince's "Sweetums" to The Muppet Show's old bickering duo, Statler and Waldorf, and from Scooter to Sam Eagle as well. Those were some cute moments.

I also must give a favorable thumbs up to Ashanti as Dorothy. The idea of an African-American as Dorothy would only peeve the most diehard of purists, because they did have the right idea: a young singer for the lead role. They just didn't execute that idea to perfection. By choosing a singer as Dorothy one would hope for this to be a better musical than it is, with more than just one slightly acceptable opening song, one snoozer of a modern-Sesame-Street style song about friendship, and a closing song that is simply the victim of bad timing. By that point you just want to finish this whole thing early.

In the end, it's a shame that this movie was done so poorly, on all fronts. For one thing there is indeed a strong desire for a more modern Wizard of Oz. Yet this low budget TV movie isn't it. It is one thing to scoff at someone handed lemons yet unable to make lemonade. It's far easier to scoff at someone handed two gems and deciding to crush them into sand instead. This isn't that bad, but...what was up with that giant chicken trying to seduce Gonzo? That's just not family friendly television.

                                                                    ---Techtite

 Final Rating : Near Miss. Not the worst Wizard of Oz revision of all time, but possibly the worst use of muppets in a PG "children's movie" of all time.

For more on this site's ratings system, click here.

 

Opinions? Speak your mind in Techtite's Letters Page!

 

Got a review you'd like to share? Techtite will post 2 of the best "guest" reviews received for any product, online, for all the world to see!

 

 

All text, Title graphics, and pix not of reviewed products, are created by Techtite, copyright 1999-2005; all rights reserved. Screen captures of program reviewed are used only for the purpose of review, and by no means represents any affiliation with Techtite and the distributors of this entertainment product. For further "legalese" & disclaimers, click here...