Techtite's TV Reviews!

 

 

"It is strictly for the purpose of charity that I give this music video a thumbs up. Frankly, everyone involved could have, and should have, done a much better job here."

---from the review

 

------------------

Sidebar ::

-------------

No Sidebar comments for this review. Yet.

--------------
MAIN PAGE
--------------
Reviews:
PC Games
Macintosh 
Television
DVD & BluRay
Gadgets & Gear
Hardcopy (Books)
Shows & Parks
X-box (360)
Playstation 3
Nintendo Wii
Game Cube
Portables
(PSP, DS, iPhone, iPad)
Video Games (classic)
 

 Departments :

Techtite's Latest YouTube Video!:

  

Questions? Comments? Send Them To

Techtite Letters.

 

The Techtite Ratings System :

  • Burnout
  • Near Miss
  • Small Crater
  • Large Crater
  • Deep Impact

In Association with Amazon.com

We Are The World (2010)
(also known as: "We Are the World 25 for Haiti")

A Techtite Review

Should a piece of entertainment be "reviewed," if it was meant entirely for the purpose of charity? In one word: yes. You can't release subpar products only to say, "Well it was only meant for charity anyway." The very fact it was meant for charity should mean a far superior effort! Furthermore: this video is meant as a homage, of sorts, to one of the most incredible music videos ever filmed: the 1980's smash hit, We Are the World. It was inevitable that this "sequel" music video would disappoint some diehard fans. Yet how good is it...really?

Allow me to begin with a confession: I loved the original. Who couldn't? From the late great Ray Charles and Michael Jackson, to 1980's musician heavyweights like Lionel Richie, Stevie Wonder, Paul Simon, Kenny Rogers, Tina Turner, Billy Joel, Diana Ross, Dionne Warwick, Willie Nelson, Bruce Springsteen, Cyndi Lauper, Kenny Loggins, Steve Perry, Daryl Hall, Huey Lewis, Bob Dylan...need I go on? The original We Are the World was legendary. It was the moment MTV essentially jumped the shark, with so many 1980's singers in one singular music video. As the saying went back then: awwwesome!

Jump ahead a quarter century, and what do we get? Well, for starters: we get Justin Beiber. Now, I know; many a tween fangirl is going to be writing a scathing letter to me asking how could I take potshots at their beloved Justin, so let me be clear: I'm not. I'm just stating the obvious. The opening verse was originally sung by Lionel Richie, in a very deep voice. The new opening is sung by a 15 year old boy. While that's not automatically a "bad" video, it is very, very...different.

I could go verse by verse, singer-by-singer in this review, and to this music video's credit: I cannot. Once again this music video concept includes a very impressive roster of singers: Celine Dion, Tony Bennett, Barbra Streisand, Jennifer Hudson, Fergie, Nick Jonas, Mary J. Blige, Miley Cyrus, Enrique Iglesias, P!nk, Usher, Toni Braxton, LL Cool J, Snoop Dogg, Busta Rhymes, Kanye West, and many more. So allow me to continue the review with the most memorable moments. Let the most memorable moments speak for themselves.

Obviously, the moment everyone's talking about, is the "duet" between Janet Jackson and the late Michael Jackson. Reactions to this moment can be nothing but bittersweet. On the one hand: bravo, for the directors of this music video, to realize that nobody could replace Michael. So they used the original video footage of Michael Jackson and edited it into the new music video, with Janet Jackson singing a gentle background chorus along with him. It's a cute idea, except for the obvious nitpicks. Why didn't they do the same thing, for the late Ray Charles? In fact; why not have a "reunion" video instead of a remake, and reunite all the original singers, along with video footage of Ray and Michael? It wasn't like a remake was ever going to match the original classic anyway, so why try?

Fans of modern musicians might think this is a "they don't sing like the used to" sort of review. No way. I love modern singers. I really do. Yet with all due respect; the flaws of 1980's singers actually helped the original project. Every 1980's singer was a shameless showoff, both on and off the stage. So when you put them all in one room together and gave them one verse each; well, let's just say each singer wanted their verse to "shine" the brightest! Steve Perry, Cyndi Lauper, Lionel Richie, Michael Jackson, Ray Charles, Stevie Wonder and Bruce Springsteen, each sang their vocals in a way that was definitively their own. Is the problem with this remake the singers? Not exactly; each of these singers had the ability to "bring it." They just didn't bring it.

Here's a good example of how even the best singer didn't give this music video an "A" grade effort. Love or hate Celine Dion: she is well known for her strong singing voice, in award winning songs like "My Heart Will Go On." So when I tell you that she was given the same verse that Cyndi Lauper sang with such intensity 25 years ago, I'm sure you, just like I did, expected this moment to equal (or even surpass?) the original. How do I put this delicately? It did not. One can only presume Celine was saving her voice for a concert tour, because no way is this vocal performance her best work. What happened here?

The sole exception: Miley Cyrus. Look; I'm not a fanboy by any means, though let me tell you: it's the fact I'm not a fanboy which forces me to give Miley Cyrus credit. I don't own a single Miley Cyrus album. Yet when she sang her singular verse; she "brought it." Trolls will say "oh no no no," so let me be clear: I hardly know the girl. In fact; when I first heard the song, I didn't even know who was singing that verse. I simply thought to myself: "That singer came to sing." Then I watch the music video and saw that singer was Miley Cyrus. Interpret that as you will.

Ah yes, then there's the rapping. You read that right. The rappers decided to conclude the video with their own little rapping number. Look; there are fans of rap, and "h8ters" of rap. I'm not taking either side. I'm just saying the obvious: be consistent. If you begin a dinner with spaghetti, don't conclude the dinner with a hot dog. If you begin a music video with Justin Beiber, don't conclude the song with Snoop Dogg. Mind you; in the original music video, you had country singers, pop singers, blues singers, heavy metal singers, and rock stars. Yet by stark contrast: they all sang in unison, as one voice, with a singular style of song. Rapping...? Whose flawed idea was this?

Yet at the core of this music video's flaws is the flaw with every music video of the new century. These voices are so synthesized; can anyone, aside from diehard fanboys, actually tell who is singing which verse? Modern songs are so synthesized there is very little "human element" left. In a music video about humanity, this is the biggest flaw of all.

---Techtite

Three Out of Five Stars

 Final Rating : Small Crater. It is strictly for the purpose of charity that I give this music video a thumbs up. Frankly, everyone involved could have, and should have, done a much better job here.

For more on this site's ratings system, click here.

 

Opinions? Speak your mind in Techtite's Letters Page!

 

Got a review you'd like to share? Techtite will post 2 of the best "guest" reviews received for any product, online, for all the world to see!

 

 

All text, Title graphics, and pix not of reviewed products, are created by Techtite, copyright 1999-2010; all rights reserved. Screen captures of program reviewed are used only for the purpose of review, and by no means represents any affiliation with Techtite and the distributors of this entertainment product. For further "legalese" & disclaimers, click here...