|
|
The Guy Game

Sorry; order
link unavailable
(see
review; this is actually a GOOD thing!)
Who has a problem about college girls at
Spring Break flashing their breasts? Not me. However; it's not something
worthy of a video game, is it? Such is the paradox behind The
Guy Game. On the one hand --eventually-- you get to see actual boobies (the game's terminology, not mine). Then again, you could get the same thrills for
less than half the price, on any number of DVDs, amateur web sites, Usenet
bulletin boards, and on and on. With all due honesty; what is the point of this?
Well,
that's just it: the point is...boobies! Someone taped
DVD-quality video of a game show held during Spring Break,
called "The Guy Game." Through video editing trickery, you get to
"play along" with said girls, a la the syndicated game show Street
Smarts. In the first round, you must guess whether the ladies got a
trivia question right or wrong. In round two, you must choose how badly the ladies
failed the question, by selecting from a list of wrong answers.
The catch is: if they give a wrong answer, they must flash their boobies. Yes,
that's all there is to this game. End of review.
Or...not. See; a lot of people will look very
kindly at the fact that a DVD-quality game offers DVD quality video of
boobies. Shouldn't we all be shouting, "yippee yippee" at a game
that offers boobies? Not so fast, boys.
Allow me to introduce you to this little thing called the
"flash-o-meter." Here's the deal: you have to get (I'm not
kidding) around 95% of the questions right in any game, in order to see
any
nudity at all. Until then, your progress is measured by the
flash-o-meter, as it slowly moves to the right. Be forewarned: each time you
play a new game (with new contestants), the meter has to be all the way to the right, into the red zone, in order to get
any
nudity in this game. You'll be giving yourself a cheer as you first get
the meter into "green" territory, only to see that the "Guy
Game" censor bar has been replaced with (nope; I'm still not kidding
here) a digital censor bar. Fail to get the meter into the red zone
by question #12, and you wasted all your time for nothing. In short: no
boobies. You aren't even allowed to see the final game competition.
Yeah,
I know what you're thinking: this is a trivia game, and you're a trivia
whiz, so getting that flash-o-meter into the red zone will be easy as pie,
right? Wrong...but that's not because of hard questions. It's because some
questions' answers aren't even right. It's one thing for a faux
"wrong" answer to lead to some poor girl "forced" to
show her boobs; it's something else entirely, to
purport to be a trivia game, and not even get your facts
straight. Here's one of at least two dozen faux pas: "On the original
Star Trek, what was Mr. Spock's rank?" Here's the true-blue answer from
a true-blue Trekker: lieutenant commander. Mr. Spock was Captain
Kirk's first officer aboard the Enterprise. Yet someone on this
show thinks his rank was "science officer." That's not even a
rank! Even one of the ladies "calls bulls---" for this game's
(ahem) total malarkey. I must agree.
Does it matter that some drunk frat boy wrote
the trivia questions? Yes. Because in order to get that infernal "flash-o-meter"
in the red zone --i.e., finish the game at all-- you must guess if a girl
will get a question right or wrong. However; how easy is it to guess this,
when the questions aren't even right most of the time, and when they are,
you often have some idiot in the audience
scream out the answer. Would a woman who doesn't know advanced math know
advanced science? She would if some nerd gives her the answer. This reduces
this game to a mere toss of the coin; did someone
tell each contestant the answer, or not? Guessing this isn't challenging at all. It's not
even a real game.
Here's
where the game even gets a bit mean. Imagine you just lost an answer because
some guy in the
audience gave it away, only to have this Asian chick pop onto the
screen, and insult you for your oh-so-dumb performance. At the risk of being
blunt; if we never get to see this girls' chest, why is
she here? Even more pointless is how you must choose a girl icon as your
icon in the game (???), and if you get too many questions wrong, she flicks
you off. Gee, what fun this is...and so much better than seeing nude
boobies!
Okay, enough sarcasm. There are at least some
things this game got right, for the record. For one, you do get to see
boobies --eventually-- and what's more, the episode you unlocked is unlocked
for good, meaning you see boobies all you want. In addition: contestants are
admittedly well chosen, and are all
of the "what's a nice girl like you doing in a video game like
this" variety. What's more; they flash their boobs...presuming you can
either guess what questions they got right by dumb luck, or remember the
order of their mistakes, and simply replay each game again (in other words: cheat). It's
your choice.
Make it to the end of each game, and you get
to see contestants battle for the grand prize (whatever it was, we're never
told), forcing them to do something that, for all intent, has them jump up
and down topless. Be it a sack race topless, a hula hoop contest topless, a
jumping jack competition topless, or a jump rope competition topless. you'll
certainly get to see every contestant...topless. Well, at least you will
eventually, after finishing the trivia game that really isn't.
Boobies notwithstanding, however, there really isn't enough game here to
recommend said game. How can I give a thumbs up to a game when there isn't
any "game"...? Winning this game is based on mere dumb luck, with
trivia offering the occasional answer which isn't even with correct facts half the
time. Then there's the jerks shouting out answers in the crowd, followed
almost every time with a wrong answer by dumb luck alone, with that condescending
Asian woman asking what's wrong with you. Agreed. What made me try this
game? There are a lot better ways to see some "boobies." This is not one of them.
---Techtite
Sorry; order link unavailable.
| All text, Title
graphics, and pix not of reviewed product, are created by Techtite,
copyright 1999-2003; all rights reserved. Screen captures of program
reviewed are discrete thumbnails, used only for the purpose of
review, and by no means represent any affiliation with Techtite and the distributors of that product. For further "legalese"
& disclaimers, click here... |
|